Fraternal Order of Police Midvale Police Lodge 7
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870453591
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Midvale, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8012054011
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fraternal Beneficiary Societies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,056
- Expenses
- $16,383
- Assets
- $24,386
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Non profit organization that supports Officers and the Police organization by making donations and physically supporting events with volunteers. The FOP is heavily involved in Officer Rights protection and endorsing legislation that benefits Officer safety and well-being.
What it reported doing in 2010
In 2010, the Midvale FOP made financial donations to officers who have had family losses, to families of fallen Officers and to organizations that support victim reparations. It also held events to promote the Organization and to gain community support. It also sponsored meetings and gatherings for the members of the lodge. These meetings are for information sharing and upcoming events planning. All members of the Midvale Lodge benefited from the meetings and several Officers and their families benefitted from the financial donations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 63% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.