Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #70
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 370981238
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Urbana, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2173842324
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,751
- Expenses
- $89,001
- Assets
- $32,128
- Liabilities
- $555
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAIGE BENNETT (PRESIDENT-FRATERNAL)
- OLIVER MARQUEZ (VICE PRESIDENT-FRATERNAL)
- BRIAN INGRAM (PRESIDENT-BARGAINING)
- ADAM MARCOTTE (VICE PRESIDENT-BARGAINING)
People named in this filing
- PAIGE BENNETT (PRESIDENT-FRATERNAL)
- OLIVER MARQUEZ (VICE PRESIDENT-FRATERNAL)
- BRYAN FINK (SECRETARY-FRATERNAL)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To encourage fraternal, charitable, and social activities among law enforcement officers
What it reported doing in 2022
Coats for Kids - Funds are raised by the Champaign-Urbana Elks Lodge and remitted to the Organization. The Organization find children in the community that are in need of "coats and warm clothing," purchase the items, and distribute them to the children.Other Assistance - The Organization donates funds to support various local organizations and individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.