Fraternal Order Of Police Lodge 113

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521884474
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4109842159
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fraternal Beneficiary Societies

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,490
Expenses
$1,300
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Darren Gregory (President)
  • Timothy Campbell (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Darren Gregory (President)
  • Timothy Campbell (Vice President)
  • Sherri Britt Anderson (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and defend the constitution of the United States of America and State of MD and to encourage social, charitable, and educational activities among law enforcement officers and the civil systems.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Lodge is a vehicle of communication for the members among themselves and then between the members and Police and Law Enforcement Officials and Elected or Appointed Officers of Government at all levels. The Ledge adheres to a doctrine of cooperation in its communications, rather than to adversary principles. However, if the time arises when the Lodge must protect the individual member's rights through its collective unity, the Lodge shall do so vigorously through findings of fact and law , and with proper presentation of such to suitable authority . Where injustice persists, the Lodge will prevail upon the appropriate administrative or governmental machinery or the courts until grievances are adequately redressed. To support and defend the constitution of the United States of America and State of MD and to encourage social, charitable, and educational activities among law enforcement officers and the civil systems. civil systems.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 82.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.