Fraternal Order of Police John Nelson Memorial Pasco Lodge 29 Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592839082
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Land O Lakes, FL, USA
Phone
7272430157
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$198,764
Expenses
$174,831
Assets
$426,644
Liabilities
$143,358

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY GRAY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JEFFREY GRAY (PRESIDENT)
  • JESSE GRAHAM (VICE PRESIDE)
  • W SCOTT HUMPHREY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The fraternal order of police, john nelson memorial pasco lodge 29, inc. Functions as a primary source of support for members and their families. A primary function of the organization is for the provision of life insurance benefits as a fraternal society, together with provision of legal defense benefits for members and their families. Additionally, the lodge provides assistance and comfort to sick members and their families, it provides and maintains a lodge facility to foster goodwill and support for all police officer members and their families.

What it reported doing in 2025

The lodge provides assistance and comfort to sick members and their families, it provides and maintains a lodge facility to foster goodwill and support for all police officer members and their families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, 12% for grants, and 22% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.44; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $153K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.