Fraternal Order of Eagles New Yak Aerie No 2817
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930404799
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Newport, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5412652430
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,720
- Expenses
- $62,554
- Assets
- $213,192
- Liabilities
- $5,009
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RONALD JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RONALD JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- LARRY JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- ARLEN PHILLIPS (PAST PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fraternal and social association whose members hold special events and fundraisers through its ladies auxiliary to provide funds for local charities to improve lives and promote peace.
What it reported doing in 2024
Charitable giving for the year ended may 31, 2025 distributed 10,000, with 2,000 as scholarships, 4,500 to members in need, and 3,500 to nonprofit organizations in the newport Oregon community and beyond.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 46.9%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 65%; rating input score 65; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.41; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 46.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.