Fraternal Order of Eagles Missouri State Auxiliary

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237289243
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Poplar Bluff, MO, USA
Phone
5737187868
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fraternal Societies

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,132
Expenses
$58,113
Assets
$88,934
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lindsay Dunn (President)

People named in this filing

  • Nancy Congdon (Chairman of the Executive Board)
  • Lindsay Dunn (President)
  • Sheryl Merriman (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fraternal organization that strives to make human life more desirable by lessening its ills and promoting peace, prosperity, gladness, and hope. Members pay dues and give charitable contributions. All administrative costs are paid by membership dues. 100% of all contributions are distributed as grants to various causes. These causes include but are not limited to The Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Memorial Foundation, MO/KS Bar-H Ranch, Cerebral Palsy, Eagle Village, Lupus Fund, Muscular Dystrophy, Children's Trust Fund, SIDS, and Missouri State President's Charity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Grants were distributed/donated to charities: Cerebral Palsy - Development Center of the Ozarks $2900; Children's Trust Fund $3325; SIDS - Infant Loss Resources $4504; Lupus - University of Missouri $2210; Camp Hope $155; Meals on Wheels $360; Autism $50; Diabetes Research Center - Bridge to the Cure $150

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.