Fraternal Order of Eagles
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581651548
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7704586981
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,129
- Expenses
- $54,101
- Assets
- $65,128
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- K A TAYLOR (PRESIDENT)
- SARAH RILEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SANDRA ZOUCHA (SECRETARY): $3,864 total reported compensation
- ELLEN STEBBINS (TREASURER): $750 total reported compensation
- K A TAYLOR (PRESIDENT): $374 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To raise funds for cancer alzheimers and diabetes research and childrens charities
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide charitable contributions to multiple charitable organizations
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 17
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.2%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 20.4%; rating input score 20
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.2% of revenue deployed · 20.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.