Fraternal Order of Eagles-4401
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593505391
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- South Daytona, FL, USA
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fraternal Beneficiary Societies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $85,777
- Expenses
- $126,507
- Assets
- $151,884
- Liabilities
- $11,541
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN POYDOCK (PRESIDENT/SE)
People named in this filing
- MARTIN CARON (TRUSTEE)
- HARVEY GILL (TRUSTEE CHAI)
- WAYNE JONES (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our f.o.e. Charity foundation awards grants to local and international organizations to aid in patient care and prevention for a variety of causes. Some of the causes included are: alzheimer's, muscular dystrophy, child abuse, diabetes, breast cancer, and homeless shelter. Please see the auxiliary monthly charity list for a complete list. Membership dues are used to fund the operating activities of the organization.all fundraising events are done on the premises by the members. The organization also raisies funds to provide the needy families of the community meals during thanksgiving and christmas. The meals are prepared by the ladies auxiliary and the supplies are donated by the members. The organization does monthly charity auctions. The organization also holds daily, weekly, and monthly raffles of gift baskets. The gifts for the gift baskets are donated by the members of the organization and are assembled by the ladies auxiliary. About 4 times a year the organization holds events w
What it reported doing in 2020
To support various charitable organizations in the central Florida area
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 87% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 65.1%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -47.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 65.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 145 of 16 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $82K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.