Fraternal Association of American Yeomen

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
395088991
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Great Cacapon, WV, USA
Phone
7737099457
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fraternal Beneficiary Societies

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,715
Expenses
$1,200
Assets
$8,515
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Caleb Sturges (President)

People named in this filing

  • Caleb Sturges (President)
  • John West (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inculcate the principles of Reciprocity, Honor and Fidelity; to instill a reverence for Divinity; to provide for the maintenance of the American Yeomen to perpetuate itself as a fraternal organization; to insure its members against maintained disorder; to cultivate good fellowship among and align the interests of American Yeomen and their communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

We were only incorporated for 2 months at the end of 2025, and did not get a checking account until April of this year, so we did not collect or distribute significant financial benefits last year. We had over 200 dues paying members last year but we only have members pay dues for the rest of the quarter when they sign up, so since we started charging Dues in October that was only $5 per member But we did start to collect emergency payment and work benefit payments that are part of Dues - no payments to members were made in those two months. We had our usual fraternal social activities in October.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 87.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.1; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.