Franklin County Agricultural Societ

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481162106
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Ottawa, KS, USA
Phone
7852422836
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,600
Expenses
$130,058
Assets
$345,127

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUSTIN WEBB (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICK FERGUSON (DIRECTOR)
  • BRAD SHOEMAKER (DIRECTOR)
  • JUSTIN WEBB (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The franklin county agricultural society sponsors the franklin county fair. The fair is held annually to promote education in domestic and agricultural enterprises for the people of franklin and surrounding counties through exhibits, competition, and demonstrations. The fair also provides a venue for youth and other residents to showcase projects they have completed during the year. The fair also provides entertainment which generally consists of rodeo, barbecue, demolition derby and carnival. A livestock auction for the 4-h and ffa livestock exhibitors concludes the fair.

What it reported doing in 2024

Annual county fair provides exhibitions and demonstrations of domestic and agricultural endeavors. The fair also provides entertainment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.