Franciscan Sisters of the Poor Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
112859284
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
212.818.1987
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$668,369
Expenses
$836,930
Assets
$16,247,259
Liabilities
$1,408,082

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SISTER WILMA MOLINARI (President)

People named in this filing

  • SISTER WILMA MOLINARI (President)
  • SISTER MICHELA REFATTO (Secretary)
  • SISTER MARA BELLUTTA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Franciscan Sisters of the Poor Foundation generates resources so the Franciscan Sisters of the Poor can carry out ministries that serve people in need with compassion, hope, healing, and dignity. The Foundation states that 100% of donated funds go directly to the Sisters’ programs. An international congregation, the Sisters arrived in the United States from Germany in 1858 to minister to the poor and sick in Cincinnati. The Sisters have their “feet on the street" meeting the needs of our brothers and sisters one-on-one. They bring hope, healing, and dignity to the forgotten in Brazil, Italy, Philippines, Senegal, and the United States. They operate daycare centers and schools, shelters, soup kitchens, healthcare clinics, maternity programs, and a senior residence facility. They provide education and training centers that empower women to be financially independent. By...

What it reported doing in 2025

Organizing and administering activities to raise funds to help supportthe mission of the franciscan sisters of the poor and its supportedorganizations . Support & treatment for trafficked women . Wages, benefits and school supplies . Scholarship programs for poor high school students . Food, clothing, shoes & personal items for individuals . Provide treatments for low income patrons . Provide haircuts to low income patrons

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.41; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $606K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.