Franciscan Sisters Charitable Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840733072
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
3037267575
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,154
Expenses
$44,131
Assets
$308,907
Liabilities
$3,749

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SR Theresa Langfield (Vice President)
  • Mary Alice Bramming (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Tom Young (Chairman)
  • SR Theresa Langfield (Vice President)
  • Kathrryn Nusbaum (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Franciscan Sisters Charitable Fund of Colorado, Inc. is a Colorado Not-For-Profit Corporation. Its purpose is to provide emergency assistance and programs to low income residents of Wheaton Franciscan-Developed Properties in Colorado.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Franciscan Sisters Charitable Fund of Colorado, Inc. is a Colorado Not-For-Profit Corporation. Its purpose is to provide emergency assistance and programs to low income residents of Wheaton Franciscan-Developed Properties in Colorado. Types of assistance include, but are not limited to, rental, food and medical assistance, tutoring and other programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.