Franciscan Care Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274348363
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8085478066
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,754,446
- Expenses
- $2,293,181
- Assets
- $4,180,464
- Liabilities
- $2,981,566
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHELEEN MORIMOTO (PRESIDENT, CEO, DIRECTOR)
- LAURI RASMUSSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHELEEN MORIMOTO (PRESIDENT, CEO, DIRECTOR): $320,601 total reported compensation
- CRAIG SHANER (CFO): $223,288 total reported compensation
- LAURI RASMUSSEN (VICE PRESIDENT): $172,826 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule othe franciscan adult day center provides assistance with activities for daily living and personal care for elders and those with disabilities needing special attention in a safe environment. The participants enjoy arts and crafts, exercise, games, and make new friends. Children from nearby schools participate in the activities, creating positive mutually beneficial experiences. The service provides peace of mind for elders whose caregivers work during the day and are not able to be at home or are in need of respite.in addtion, 79 students were enrolled in preschool. Many of the students were supported by public assistance programs to help cover registrations and/or tuition. The school remained one of the most affordable preschools in the area throughout 2024-2025. As part of st. Francis healthcare system of Hawaii, franciscan care services carries on the legacy of st. Marianne cope and the sisters of st. Francis, who came to the islands in 1883 to care for those afflicted with hansen's disease.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.82; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $321K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $153K reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.