Francis House of Sacramento
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942437147
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9164432646
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $373,580
- Expenses
- $366,998
- Assets
- $508,691
- Liabilities
- $54,844
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICIA PITZER (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PATRICIA PITZER (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $62,431 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Francis house center (fhc) seeks to profoundly change the lives of families and individuals struggling with homelessness and poverty. We strive to inspire, empower and provide resources that lead to a transformation from life on the streets to long-term stability. Fhc is a place of kindness, love, and respect for our clients.
What it reported doing in 2014
Francis house center is a community-based organization providing some of the most basic services and resources to those living on the edge as well as those who have become homeless. We believe that every individual deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. We give the disenfranchised and the destitute some hope and a helping hand to get them started on their way to self-sufficiency and self-respect. Francis house offers programs, resource coaching, and advocacy to the homeless and nearly-homeless. During the past year, francis house center served approximately 9,000 people, including nearly 450 children, through a number of our programs. Some examples are:- 215 families each received 7 days of temporary shelter in a local motel;- more than 75 of those families found stable housing with the help of our staff and volunteers;- 300 individuals were assisted in our job development center, where they received personalized coaching from staff and volunteers as they developed resumes, accessed on-line job opportunities, received counsel regarding job interviews, etc.;- 75 people found jobs through our job development center;- 20 people received transportation assistance to get to those jobs for their first few weeks until their first paycheck;- 3,400 bus passes were distributed to people needing to attend interviews, visit doctors, or apply for benefits;- 2,000 forms of identification were funded by francis house center; - 3,300 individuals received discount vouchers for their California id, reducing the cost from $28 to $8.in addition to our California id program, regional transit assistance, family rescue temporary shelter program, and the job development program, we offer free notary services, veterans' advocacy, a free eyeglass program, and hot coffee every morning.our staff and volunteers field numerous calls each day from those seeking information and referrals. Francis house center also produces "the street sheet," which is distributed widely among the homeless community and social service agencies and features a comprehensive and definitive listing of resources in the sacramento region for medical and dental care, housing and shelter, drug and alcohol programs, and more. Francis house center is one of the very few non-profit agencies in the region that provide clients with financial assistance to purchase California ids. Without a valid picture id, one cannot cash a check, board a greyhound bus, or even obtain food at many food closets that rely on ids to check zip code qualification. In the past year, we helped over 5,300 individuals obtain government issued identification.the following is an overview of our direct client costs for the 2015 fiscal year:- $520 for gasoline vouchers - $17,900 for California ids and drivers' licenses- $27,000 value in transit passes ($13,500 actual cost)- $3,000 for hospitality and hygiene supplies for clients- $65,700 for motel vouchers- $5,300 for food assistance- $1,150 for holiday gifts and meals our resource coaches help clients navigate the maze of social services in sacramento. Some of the resources to which our clients are directed are: - clothing closets, - welfare facilities,- safe houses for battered women, - alcohol & drug abuse programs,- food closets and meal programs, - legal aid, - housing resources and shelters, - jobs or employment programs, - veterans' services.francis house center has an agreement with the sacramento regional transit district by which we can purchase transit passes for 50% of face value to distribute to our clients. As a service to other area non-profits, we do all the ordering and distribution of passes so that they can offer the same to their clients. We assist approximately 75 agencies with this service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, and 42% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $253K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $62K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.