Fox Ridge Energy & Education Trust Co Greg Fisher
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320158958
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Faith, SD, USA
- Phone
- 6059855240
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $26,317
- Assets
- $331,308
- Liabilities
- $226,011
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- GREG FISHER (SEC/TREAS)
- NORMAN DELBRIDGE (BOARD MEMBER)
- REID PALMER (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create an institute organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes: to advance education; to provide industrial and businss oriented training, with a special focus on renewable energy resources, their design, construction, operation and marketing; to erect public buildings, to lessen the burdens of government; to relieve the distress of rural communities and school district of sd and to advance educational opportunities, improve economic development and revitalize rural communities of sd.
What it reported doing in 2013
This is a pilot program which incorporates the development of a renewable energy resource to sustain a renewable energy program of education (k-12) with additional research, observation & technology development in nw South Dakota.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.59; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -67.9% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -79.9% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.