Four Rivers Association of Realtors Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820384773
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Payette, ID, USA
Phone
2089477228
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,933
Expenses
$59,381
Assets
$107,646
Liabilities
$2,344

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARKITA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
  • BARBARA HUTCHINSON (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • MARKITA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
  • BARBARA HUTCHINSON (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • REBECCA MUSSER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is the mission of the four rivers association of realtors to provide our members with the education and tools necessary to assist those in the real estate market professionally with knowledge and integrity. Members of our local board also maintain memberships in the Idaho association of realtors (ir), and/or the Oregon association of realtors (or) and the national association of realtors (nar) to promote and maintain high standards of conduct in the real estate profession.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.7%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.81; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.7% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.