Foundation of Saint Peter Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263771141
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4077303364
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $778,091
- Expenses
- $713,177
- Assets
- $108,182
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN G BEAM (President)
- STEVE KREIDT (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN G BEAM (President): $12,500 total reported compensation
- SHARONNE CULVERWELL: $11,410 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support missionaries and missionary projects; building homes for the homeless in haiti and guatemala, aiding those with leprosy in nepal and supporting bible schools in peru. Feeding the hungry, school supplies in honduras and yucatan peninsula, indian school and homes, russian schools, support in ecuador, peru, and the philippines.
What it reported doing in 2020
Outreach in nepal, africa and bolivia(care and assistance to those with leprosy and troubled teenagers)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $597K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.