Foundation for the Support of International Medical Training Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 132613755
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Niagara Falls, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7167544883
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,636
- Expenses
- $84,261
- Assets
- $170,736
- Liabilities
- $350,195
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- M ASSUNTA UFFER-MARCOLONGO (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- M ASSUNTA UFFER-MARCOLONGO (PRESIDENT): $24,180 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1) provide grants to medical institutions for medical lectureships2) provide scholarships for medical education
What it reported doing in 2025
Grant to medical organizations:1) department of medicine, the regents of the university of minnesota401 east river parkway, vcrc 1st floor, suite 131, minneapolis, mn 55455ein: 41-6007513grant: $10,0002) american society of tropical medicine &hygiene 241 18th street south, suite 501, arlington, va 22202ein: 57-0408245grant: $10000.00
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 25%; rating input score 25
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -517.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.05; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -56.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -57.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 25% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $24K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.