Foundation for Sustainable Development
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561938284
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4152834873
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Affairs, Foreign Policy, & Globalization
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $926,204
- Expenses
- $925,729
- Assets
- $44,746
- Liabilities
- $103,796
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Lisa Kuhn (Executive Dir.): $85,000 total reported compensation
- Susie Noreus FinanOper Officr (CFO): $62,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Foundation for Sustainable Development FSD or the Foundation is a nonprofit organization based in Oakland, California, whose mission is to achieve community-driven goals through asset-based development and international exchange in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. FSD? s approach focuses on mobilizing resources? human, economic, and natural? for sustainable, life-changing initiatives. The Foundation uses an asset-based community development approach that encourages self-reliance and inspires appreciation of existing resources in the community and the confidence to build upon them. FSD aims to constantly challenge itself and others to do more with what we have. The Foundation believes that with an attitude of resourcefulness, positive change is possible even in low-resource settings.
What it reported doing in 2017
Training Programs: Students and professionals receive intensive training in grassroots sustainable development while also providing human resources and technical support to our Partner NGOs. Grant Making: We support community-driven projects and capacity building initiatives in sectors ranging from Health and Environment, to Education, Gender Equality and Microfinance. Giving Circles: Giving Circles expand the grant fund through promoting more engaged, longer-term philanthropy. Capacity Building: Local Site Teams offer our NGO Partners on-site training that promote economically and environmentally sustainable programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.32; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.3% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $818K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.