Foundation for Mitochondrial Medicine Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203697012
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
8884481495
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$96,098
Expenses
$161,590
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA STANLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • LAURA STANLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHRIS BENECCHI (DIRECTOR)
  • DICK BOGER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To hasten the development of effective treatments for mitochondrial disease.

What it reported doing in 2018

Fmm's mission is to support the development of the most promising research and treatments for the many, many forms of mitochondrial disease; including improving lives of those with disease through better, faster less invasive diagnostics and to fund the cures. Priorities are: awareness for mitochondrial disease, establishing partnerships and connections to related diseases, funding the cures with treatment-oriented research.fmm's initiatives consistent of mission-driven programs and outreach to raise awareness for mitochondrial disease, highlight the connection to related neurodegenerative diseases where mitochondrial dysfunction is a common component and where research on such an important causal element can lead to treatments for multiple disease states. Programs include but are not limited to: establishment of partnerships with related disease organizations, medical institutions and affiliated non-profits, patient advocacy groups with similar and synergistic missions. Local, national and international communication efforts involved mass communication media relations, social media and internet outreach. 2017 expenses were allocated to the following endeavors: hope flies catch the cure: hope flies catch the cure is fmm's signature event, a fun-filled evening of cocktails, dinner, dancing and auctions. An annual event of friends and friends of friends gathered to help promote awareness for mitochondrial disease and raise funds for research and treatments. Several hundred people support the event, which highlights stories and testimonials of the patients struggling with mitochondrial disease.mitochondrial medicine southeast regional symposium: understanding mitochondrial disease and mitochondrial dysfunction, opportunities and impacts in the clinic and laboratory to address human energy production problems rooted in the mitochondria. In partnership with the united mitochondrial disease foundation, fmm organized and led a southeast regional symposium to focus on mitochondrial disease and mitochondrial dysfunction, which is at the root of diseases and conditions that affect the young and old, from autism to alzheimer's, in ways that can range from subtle to devastating.the program included cme sessions for scientists, practitioners and health professionals, as well as a patient and families' day for education, networking and support. In addition, a keynote address from the energy project provided a broader energy perspective as our most precious resource. An intersection of both science and human performance, this program enlightened, educated, inspired and unlocked new ideas and solutions to human energy problems facing us all.clinical sessions speakers and topics included: bruce h. Cohen, md, course chair, akron children's hospital, akron, oh- potential therapies and treatments for mitochondrial diseaseleon s. Dure, md, course co-chair, children's hospital of Alabama, birmingham, al- pediatric neurology and mitochondrial medicine at uabvictor darley-usmar, phd, university of Alabama at birmingham school of medicine, birmingham, al- bioenergetics and mitochondrial medicinedavid ferrick, agilent technologies- bioenergetics and mitochondrial medicine matt goldberg, phd, university of Alabama at birmingham school of medicine, birmingham, al- parkinson's and mitochondrial dysfunctionmichio hirano, md, columbia university, New York, ny- screening and evaluation of mitochondrial diseasesshilpa iyer, phd, university of Arkansas, fayetteville, ar- dod funding for study of leigh's diseaseamel karaa, md, Massachusetts general hospital, boston, ma- mitochondrial disease primerrobin morris, phd, ga state neuropsychology, atlanta, ga- autism and mitochondrial dysfunctiondiana shineman, alzheimer's drug discovery foundation- alzheimer's and mitochondrial dysfunctionkeshav singh, phd, university of Alabama at birmingham, al- cancer and mitochondrial dysfunction

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -68.2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -31.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $117K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.