Foundation for International Jungian Psychoanalytic Training In
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263183720
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Glenco, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8473635566
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Behavioral Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $81,974
- Expenses
- $41,685
- Assets
- $231,633
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- ROBERT ZIESERL (TREASURER)
- DEBORAH EGGER-BINIORES (CHAIR)
- CRAIG STEPHENSON (CO-CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purposes of this corporation are to support and conduct non- partisan research, education, informational and fundraising activities for the continued full-time training of candidates for the diploma in analytical psychology at english language training institutes in switzerland that are members of the international association for analytical psychology, and to engage in such other activities described in section 501(c)(3) of the code as determined appropriate by the board of directors
What it reported doing in 2024
Jungian international training zurich (jitz) was created in 2008 by several members of agap (association of graduate analytical psychologists, a member society of the iaap), who wanted a vehicle through which they and others would be able to provide tax-deductible financial support for full-time, english language jungian psychoanalytic training in zurich. This type of training has been an historical tradition in zurich since 1948, and it is maintained today by the international school of analytical psychology (isapzurich), a training institute founded by agap in 2004.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.1%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 49.1%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.56; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -67% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.