Foundation for International Cardiac and Community Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831016642
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Des Plaines, IL, USA
Phone
8478135387
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,900
Expenses
$44,210
Assets
$35,097
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dr Parag Patel (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dr Parag Patel (President)
  • Dr Erin Nasrallah (Secretary)
  • Ms Kerry Murphy (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission of the organization is dedicated to charitable purposes including but not limited to engaging young Kenyan women via helathcare training, education scholarship and lifeskills enhancement.

What it reported doing in 2023

In 2023 the organization provided PPE kits to healthcare workers in Kenya, provided over 1,000 personal hygiene and feminine products to partner programs, trained and certified more than 20 CPR/ACLS Instructors, provided over 100 scholarships and over 50 complex cardiac procedures were performed by cardiologists and medical teams trained by Global FICCS in Kenya

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 41.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.