Foundation for Inter-cultural Dialogue
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202009829
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Tempe, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 8188392028
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,067
- Expenses
- $67,336
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- UMIT OGRAS (President)
People named in this filing
- MEHMET INCE (Treasurer)
- UMIT OGRAS (President)
- RANA PEKEL (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization shall operate as a religious organization and shall provide variouseducational and worship services which are made available to all.
What it reported doing in 2016
List of Events;-7 Lectures-2 Luncheons-Tucson Meet Yourself Attendance-1 Clothing Drive-2 Food Drive for Homeless-1 Mother's Day Celebration-1 Film Screening-12 Around the Fountain Conversations-1 Marthin Luther Celebration-1 Thanksgiving Dinner-4 Panels-3 Host An important Figure Programs-6 Cooking Class-2 Coffee / Tea Nights-6 Book Club-1 Fundraising (with food)-1 Kermes - Fundraising -3 Club Activity at University
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 21.7%; rating input score 22
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -124%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -22.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 21.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.