Foundation for Filipina Womens Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473513297
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4159354396
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Intergroup, Race Relations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$350,493
Expenses
$282,539
Assets
$7,693
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILY MONDEJAR (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • BENEL SE LIBAN (Director)
  • GINA ATIENZA (Director)
  • JUSLYN MANALO (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Career, civil and human rights education of women of philippine ancestry.

What it reported doing in 2024

Publication of books, magazines and website updates to promote filipina women's capacities to lead, manage and achieve gender parity in all economic sectors. Distributed to schools, libraries, corporate diversity programs, meetings and conventions. This program helps companies achieve greater gender and racial equality and build more productive workplaces by utilizing filipina women talent. In the last 10 years, ffwn has published 4 leadership books: 1 disrupt. Filipina women: proud. Loud. Leading without a doubt. 2014. 35 authors from 9 countries. 582 pages on identity, consanguinity, affinity, migration, gender, and leadership on public policy, advocacy, diplomacy, entrepreneurship 2 disrupt 2.0. Filipina women: daring to lead 2016. 35 authors from 5 countries. 497 pages. Key themes on life and workplace disruptions, leadership competencies developed for oneself, for leading others, for leading organizations and legacy building for next generation leaders 3 disrupt 3.0. Filipina women rising. 2018. 38 authors from 9 countries. 624 pages. Leadership stories about leaning in, daring greatly, channeling grit, fueling fire, disrupting tradition and rising boldly ahead whilst embracing filipina women? S relational virtues with family, heeding the call for service, and leading lives of commitment. Disrupt 4.0 filipina women: being. 2022. 37 authors from 9 countries. 650n pages. The leadership stories center around three themes: 1 liberation - learning the right to live life as they've always wanted but couldn't because of the debilitating pressures of culture and outside forces 2 transformation - discovering the internal shifts that aligned with author's highest potential 3 change - experiencing new and exciting things that impacted how she related to the workplace and finding her place in it. With the rise of anti-asian hate, this book's authors provide a deep understanding of their struggles in bridging filipino and global cultures in the workplace.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 65% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 18
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 43.4%; rating input score 43
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 31.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35% of revenue deployed · 43.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $123K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.