Foundation for Community Impact & Health Equity
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850515175
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Ridgeway, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8037184830
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $451,935
- Expenses
- $510,728
- Assets
- $26,989
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Quintasha Knox (CEO Founder)
Highest reported compensation
- Quintasha Knox (CEO Founder): $76,604 total reported compensation
- Jacqlyn Atkins (Chief Operating Officer): $31,143 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to transform policies systems and practices to create equitable health outcomes for all generations in undeserved historically disenfranchised communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program: Cultiv8 Agribusiness Incubator - Cultiv8Agribusiness Incubator is designed to develop equip and provide technical assistance to farmers and entrepreneurs to improve our local food ecosystem. Our program was created to meet the unique needs remove barriers and advance racial equity of African American farmers by creating a hybrid model focused on both start-ups and existing agribusinesses. The incubator aims to increase access to healthy food in underserved areas by providing support resources and technical assistance to farmers and local food entrepreneurs. FCIHE provides monthly agribusiness workshops field days and technical business planning support and project management to farmers and entrepreneurs. FCIHE currently manages Ellerbe Farmers Market Project a retail expansion effort to increase access to locally sourced produce for residents in Florence County SC. The new market will allow EVF to establish a consistent and visible presence in the community and allow SNAP recipients to purchase fresh produce and staple items produced by the vegetable farm as well as a wide variety of local raised meats grains and dairy products from other local farmers livestock raisers and cattlemen. FCIHE has assisted Ellerbe Vegetable Farm with securing funding to be used for land acquisition equipment materials supplies and construction costs for the new brick-and-mortar food retail outlet. FCIHE received funding from the United States Department of Agricultures Natural Resource and Conservation Service to provide conservation technical assistance and education to historically underserved farmers and ranchers in South Carolina. Cultiv8 provided tailored education information and access to resources that decrease the barriers to implementing conservation principles into farming practice and connect low-income food-insecure persons to local sustainable small-scale agriculture for healthy food consumption. The project decreased the barriers and needs of underserved farmers to develop sustainable and long-term solutions to implementing natural resource management. In addition FCIHE assisted the United States Department of Agriculture USDA Discrimination Financial Assistance Program and American Farmland Trust as cooperators to provide financial assistance to farmers ranchers and forest landowners who experienced discrimination in USDAs farm lending before January 1 2021. During the application period FCIHE provided outreach and technical assistance under cooperative agreements with USDA. This included sharing information with farmers hosting in-person events assisting producers with applications and coordinating with regional hubs and USDA to offer insights on best practices for reaching key audiences as well as providing other support and partnership for outreach efforts. Funding Associated with program: USDA NRCS American Farmland Trust and Ellerbe Vegetable Farm
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 69.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $471K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 6 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.