Foundation for Children with Microcephaly

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830478788
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6234767494
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,166
Expenses
$21,784
Assets
$11,190
Liabilities
$259

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFFER LEWIS (FOUNDER/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFFER LEWIS (FOUNDER/CEO)
  • WILLIAM B DOBYNS MD (BOARD MEMBER)
  • KIMBERLY DOMONKOS (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Assist all persons diagnosed with microcephaly to help them progress, thrive and succeed in life. Assisting all persons diagnosed with microcephaly in making their dreams come true, providing their caretakers with knowledge about the disorder and helping them live the best, most comfortable life possible.

What it reported doing in 2013

The charitable purpose of the foundation for children with microcephaly (also known as fcm) is to provide persons diagnosed with microcephaly the necessities to progress and thrive in the following ways: the primary activity will be to provide persons throughout the united states (diagnosed with microcephaly) with fulfilling their wishes & dreams, medications, medical equipment/supplies, and therapies (including, but not limited to: physical, occupational and speech) that are unaffordable at the time of need. Fcm will acquire such necessities from contributions made to the public charity by private parties, the general public and corporations.fcm will hold a biennial convention for persons with microcephaly and their immediate family members. This biennial convention will give families of persons diagnosed with microcephaly an opportunity to learn more about their child's disorder and new ways to help their child progress. They will also be able to listen to/meet with the worlds top physicians and researchers who specialize in microcephaly. This convention will provide information and support for both microcephalic persons and their families.volunteers and employees representing fcm will make visits to new parents with children who have been diagnosed with microcephaly throughout the united states. At the visits the fcm representatives will answer questions, provide information and be there to support the parents at this devastating time in their life.fcm will maintain a web site (http://www.microcephaly.org) that will provide information for new parents (and other immediate family members) with children who have been diagnosed with microcephaly. The information will include the definition of microcephaly, answers to frequently asked questions, pictures/stories of other children with microcephaly, and most importantly support and email addresses/phone numbers to contact other parents that have been or are in the same situation. When parents find out that their child has a rare neurological disorder it is a life changing event. Many people feel alone and the web site will provide help, support, and teach them how to cope with having a child with a disability. The parents are their microcephalic child's advocate therefore they need to be comfortable with their child's disability in order for the child to progress.brochures will be prepared and distributed to immediate family members with children who are diagnosed with microcephaly. The brochures will provide vital information on how to obtain services for their child as well as where to go for support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 37.6%; rating input score 38

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -114.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -159.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -159.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -67.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 37.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.