Foundation Chrysoprase International Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611789130
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Medford, MA, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$137,000
Expenses
$69,000
Assets
$124,200

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANTZ JOACILIA OSIRUS (PRESIDENT)
  • SHERLEY BLANC (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FRANTZ JOACILIA OSIRUS (PRESIDENT)
  • WILFRIDE MICHEL (TREASURER)
  • ALEX LIMAS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The FCI exists to carry out a whole series of activities that can promote the development of the most vulnerable sections of the population by providing them with direct support to survive on a daily basis food health care medicines and others but also to change their living conditions support for the creation of microenterprises scholarships construction of houses. In other words we want not only to give them as much fish as possible but also and above all to show them how to fish.

What it reported doing in 2024

School supplies distributed during school opening season 250 children and families in need received backpacks pencils pens notebooks and Copybooks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 26.1%; rating input score 26
  • Program expense ratio: 65.7%; rating input score 66

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.8; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 83.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 75.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 26.1% of revenue deployed · 65.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $45K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.