Foster Care Review Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 650118944
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3056792742
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,583,840
- Expenses
- $2,255,293
- Assets
- $763,745
- Liabilities
- $114,504
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE WEBER (PRESIDENT)
- AARON GORDON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CANDICE MAZE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CANDICE MAZE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $146,154 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2024
Florida foster care review (ffcr) serves as a bridge between the child welfare system and the community at large. Ffcr harnesses the power of its extensive volunteer and partner network on behalf of children and young adults impacted by miami's foster care system and those at risk of entering or re-entering the system. Ffcr's innovative programs and professional team of subject-matter experts develop and implement child-centered, individualized strategies that allow youth to heal from trauma and grow up with the love and support of stable adults and nurturing families.ffcr's citizen review panel (crp) program engages, trains and supports volunteers who conduct review hearings for "continued on schedule o" abused or neglected children in miami-dade county's foster care system. With guidance and supervision by ffcr's staff, crp volunteers interview the youth, his/her case manager, and caregivers; and scour medical reports, educational records and therapy records to identify critical gaps in the child's care. Each ffcr review hearing culminates in an individually-tailored set of recommendations to address each child's unmet needs to ensure a safe, timely and permanent exit from the system. Once approved by the dependency court judge, these recommendations become binding and enforceable court orders. Ffcr staff engage in post-review advocacy efforts to ensure that all time-sensitive safety and well-being needs are properly addressed.ffcr's permanency roundtable (prt) program curates and convenes an individualized multi-disciplinary team for each child served and facilitates an initial prt session to develop a customized and strategic permanency action plan. Every prt team reconvenes for subsequent roundtable sessions every 30-45 days to review progress towards the child's permanency goal, to modify the plan as needed and to tackle challenges and break through barriers. Ffcr's program staff coordinate these follow-up roundtables until the child reaches permanency. Between sessions, ffcr tackles time-consuming tasks, including family finding, and explores ways to safely re-connect children with family. Staff mine court files for crucial information and work to match children with prospective families. They also engage and support prospective adoptive families by helping to remove barriers to adoption and provide support to youth who have questions and concerns about the adoption process. Ffcr also provides family preservation & support (fps) services to children and families previously served by ffcr's prt program who achieved legal permanency and their foster care case closed. Ffcr staff contact these children and their families every two months for at least the first 12 months following the closure of their dependency case to conduct a needs assessment. Strength-based and solution-oriented, the assessment process provides a safe and nurturing space for families to share and address any new or ongoing challenges they may be experiencing. Taking the family's lead, our expert team connects children and their caregivers to a wide variety of resources and services ranging from securing safe, stable housing to ensuring the continuation of a child's disability benefits and/or services. Staff help families navigate complex entitlement programs, search for quality child care, secure critical documents such as birth certificates and final adoption papers, and more. At the family's request, the fps program team may continue to provide support beyond the 12-month timeframe until any outstanding issues are fully resolved. Families are also encouraged to reach out to ffcr's program team in the future should challenges arise.ffcr's connect 2 community (c2c) initiative enriches the lives of children who are served by ffcr by connecting them to new experiences that are individually tailored to meet each child's unique needs, interests and/or goals. Program staff leverage ffcr's extensive network of community-based organizations, corporations and v
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $25.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.