Fortaleza

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843629579
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
Phone
9198351525
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,101
Expenses
$133,424
Assets
$105
Liabilities
$227

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ILIANA SANTILLAN (EXECUTIVE DIREC)
  • STEFANIE ARTEGA (Director)
  • FELICIA ARRIAGA (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase civic engagement and educate residents about issues that impact their lives.to increase the understanding of the public of ways to imporove the quality of life of all marginalized communities.to emphasize civic engagement of young people.

What it reported doing in 2022

The board of directors of the organization decided in april of 2022 to dissolve the organization and to distribute the net assets to another 501 (c) ( 4)organization with similar purposes and objectives.hence, the liquidating distribution to la fuerza was the principal activity of the organization in 2022.the board of directors determined in april of 2022 that the goals and purposes of the organization could best be met by another exempt organization with similar purposes and objectives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,220.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.16; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -93.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -99.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.