Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
756004761
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Phone
8176656500
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Symphony Orchestras

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,380,717
Expenses
$16,108,991
Assets
$37,913,229
Liabilities
$5,195,350

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

89 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEITH CERNY (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT SPANO (MUSIC DIRECTOR): $326,741 total reported compensation
  • KEITH CERNY (PRESIDENT & CEO): $324,372 total reported compensation
  • CARRIE ELLEN ADAMIAN (CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER): $168,037 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o-to perform great symphonic music at the highest level of artistic excellence to educate, entertain, and enhance cultural life.-to present engaging music education programs for young people to foster early interest in and inspire lifelong enjoyment of music. -to achieve ever-greater levels of artistic accomplishment and leadership in fort worth and across the nation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education concerts - we performed 21 education concerts across north Texas, reaching an audience of 14,500 students and families. School districts engaged include fort worth isd, weatherford isd, birdville isd, h-e-b isd, northwest isd, arlington isd, frisco isd, and keller isd. Performances provided students with interactive musical experiences that foster community connection and artistic appreciation. Community concerts and events - we produced 8 community performances and events across tarrant county that engaged approximately 4,300 adults and children, including community members from historically under-represented groups. Providing the community with meaningful outreach events helped to uplift, educate, and (cont. On sch. O) inspire people of various backgrounds while enriching the county's broader arts and culture sector.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 93
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.9%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 96.2%; rating input score 96; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.35; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.9% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 75 of 78 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $12.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $327K · 89 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $967K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.