Fort Worth Crisis Pregnancy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752548774
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Phone
8179249110
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$964,851
Expenses
$976,237
Assets
$1,560,830
Liabilities
$39,132

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • J BRENT MCDONALD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SPENCER ALBRIGHT (DIRECTOR)
  • CHRISTINE BEMBER (SECRETARY)
  • GORDON BRUCKS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to empower young women and men to make a positive decision about their unplanned pregnancy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Ongoing care programs include referrals, education classes, material assistance and ongoing care and support for clients. We provided an abundance of diapering supplies and baby care items. Clients completing prenatal education courses are rewarded with baby showers. In 2024, the center gave 528 referrals for medicaid/chip, 192 referrals for wic, 175 referrals for counseling, 285 referrals for becoming mom, 65 referrals for healthy tx women, 44 referrals for apr network, and 10 referrals for substance abuse . Free educational classes were offered to help prepare for pregnancy, delivery, and care of the newborn. Male and female clients attended 161 classes. Educational classes were provided in english and in spanish. Educational classes include neonatal growth and development, sids prevention, the importance of nutrition during pregnancy, and much more. By attending classes, completing homework, and actively participating in discussions, the clients can earn points to "shop" for material goods which include baby clothes, diapers, and baby care equipment. All material goods distributed are brand new and free of charge. The center also provided referrals for the car seat program. The fort worth pregnancy center continues to be a distributor of pack & plays as part of the safe sleep program. These pack & plays are provided to those who did not have a safe sleeping surface for their newborns. The goal of this program is to reduce the infant mortality rate in fort worth. In 2024, the center provided more than 290 packs of diapers, baby clothes and other baby care items.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 70.9%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.3% of revenue deployed · 70.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $692K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.