Fort Wayne Volleyball Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351752479
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Centers, Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,964
Expenses
$94,396
Assets
$78,919
Liabilities
$38,856

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • C Anthony Terrell (Club Director)
  • Greg Hunt (Board Member)
  • Brenda Graham (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Education training and competition in volleyball

What it reported doing in 2024

Educational: During the 2025 season 2024 tax year the Fort Wayne Volleyball Club had 85 athletes ranging in age from 10-16 years old on 9 teams. Players were divided into three skill levels based on age and ability. Level one had 2 teams consisting of 19 players ages 10 - 12. These players received instructional training of basic volleyball skills 2 nights a week for January - April. Level two is the regional league of 12 - 14 year old players. The Club had 67 players on 7 teams. These teams train twice a week and played competitive games with other northern Indiana volleyball clubs once a month. Level three is the high school regional teams. The Club had 18 players on 2 teams who trained three 3 times a week and played at least one 1 sometimes two 2 competitive games a month.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $94K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.