Fort Wayne Trails Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421545637
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Phone
2609690079
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$510,220
Expenses
$858,457
Assets
$995,890
Liabilities
$2,265

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • KENT CASTLEMAN (EXECUTIVE DI): $112,188 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fort wayne trails is a community partner and advocate in the development of a connected, multi-purpose system of trails in allen county.

What it reported doing in 2024

For the 2024-2025 programming year, fwt had the following accomplishments: vann family crossing: fwt played a key role in working with the city of fort wayne to receive a 5m gift from the vann family foundation for a much needed connection over coliseum blvd. Linking the north and south trail systems to create 130 miles of connected trail. The crossing will be built in 2026. Cedar creek parks trail: fwt continued to help coordinate and advocate for funding to complete this trail from metea north county park to grabill, in downtown. Fwt helped manage the project during construction in 2025. Pufferbelly-golden spike: fwt contributed 300,000 to the building of the golden spike section of the pufferbelly trail. It was used as leverage for matching funds for a next level trails grant received from the state of Indiana for 2.7m. Local advocacy: fort wayne trails played a critical role in helping acquire the right of way for the union chapel trail trail from the pufferbelly to auburn rd. With our efforts, the project will be able to go to construction in 2026. Regional trail advocacy: fort wayne trails plays an active role on the poka-bache coalition working to build the 83-mile trail from pokagon state park to oubache state park. This included assisting with the development of a us dept. Of transportation grant application for planning dollars for the remaining 30 miles of trail. Website and social media engagement: fort wayne trails is the voice of the trails and a major resource for project-based information and connectivity information. The project page of our website was visited 3,088 times in the fiscal year; the maps page was visited 14,737 times. We have 15k+ followers on facebook and 7k+ followers on instagram. Community engagement: fort wayne trails offered programming to engage the community in using the trail system. Over 50,000 maps were distributed to trail users for system navigation and for trail-friendly business interaction. Through our events and programs, 1,606 interactions were captured. Programs to familiarize people with the system and trail safety included the trek the trails and tread the trails programs as well as runners in the annual pufferbelly race. Adopt-a-greenway: fort wayne trails assumed this program from the city of fort wayne to expand it to be county wide. 55 groups of volunteers adopted 53, 1-3 mile stretches of the trail system to pick up litter and trash two times a year. For the 2024 calendar year, 247 volunteers were engaged in this program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -68.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.1%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $637K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.