Fort Washington Fencor Girls Basketball

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811712277
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Bensalem, PA, USA
Phone
8565511255
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$125,350
Expenses
$117,983
Assets
$79,360
Liabilities
$82,708

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHELE LONDON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • MICHELE LONDON (Vice President)
  • STUART LONDON (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission is for each player to grow as a person and player, for the team to play as well as it can and for everyone to have some fun. Fencor also wants to provide appropriate opportunities for the older players to receive "exposure" to college coaches and to give the best possible coaching for yournger players so they can succeed at the middle and high school level.

What it reported doing in 2023

Mission is for each player to grow as a person and player, for the team to play as well as it can, and for everyone to have some fun. Also, Fencor wants to provide appropriate opportunities for the older players to receive "exposure" to college coaches and to give the best possible coaching for younger players so they can succeed at the middle and high school level.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.04; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 58.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $118K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.