Fort Payne-main Street Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473640276
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Fort Payne, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2569962131
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $172,667
- Expenses
- $134,115
- Assets
- $120,886
- Liabilities
- $851
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- AMY WHITE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- CONNIE J FULLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- AMY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- AMY WHITE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- STEVE MALCOM (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to engage in the nonprofit business of promoting local business in the historic downtown area of fort payne, Alabama; and to transact any and all lawful, nonprofit business for which corporations may be incorporated under Alabama law.
What it reported doing in 2025
To engage in the nonprofit business of promoting local business in the historic downtown area of fort payne, Alabama; and to transact any and all lawful, nonprofit business for which coporations may be incorporated under Alabama law.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 11
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.9%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -35.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.9% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.