Fort Mill School District Athletic Booster

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272996749
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Fort Mill, SC, USA
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,886
Expenses
$43,877
Assets
$186,485

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROGER HENDRICK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROGER HENDRICK (PRESIDENT)
  • MINDY ATKINS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of this nonprofit organization is to encourage and promote athletic and recreational activities for the youth of the fort mill school district, specifically at the middle school and higher levels. The athletic board has been formed to promote general welfare of all athletes of the fort mill school district, to provide assistance to the administration, athletic coordinator, and coaching staff, and to facilitate excellence in the athletic programs of the school district. To this end, the athletic board shall endeavor to operate with the middle schools in the fort mill school district to provide volunteers, equipment, and services through fund raising efforts and community contributions. The athletic board shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national and ethnic origin or religious preference.

What it reported doing in 2014

The athletic board shall endeavor to operate with the middle schools in the fort mill school district to provide volunteers, equipment, and services through fund raising efforts and community contributions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34.3%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.7%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.25; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 52% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.3% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.