Fort Greene Tennis Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475212189
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 4124250872
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Racquet Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,375
- Expenses
- $11,289
- Assets
- $279,528
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEX ORDING (PRESIDENT)
- TOURE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATTHEW CABALLERO (DIRECTOR)
- MARVIN BARKSDALE (DIRECTOR)
- MOHAMMAD EL-HAJ AHMAD (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The fort greene tennis association (fgta) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization (EIN number 47-5212189) that aims to promote court repair and maintenance, community partnerships and volunteerism, and health and wellness through tennis activity at fort greene park. Fgta strives to achieve these goals through scheduled events like tournaments, clean-up and repair days at the courts, and fundraising drives.fgta was founded in 2009 when the fort greene tennis courts were in bad shape. A number of local tennis enthusiasts worked hard to organize and raise over $60,000 to repair the courts. With that strong beginning, fgta continues to be an active force in fort greene park, in partnership with fort greene park conservancy.
What it reported doing in 2024
To promote court repair and maintenance, community partnerships and volunteerism, and health and wellness through tennis activity at fort greene park.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 24
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.9%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 55.4%; rating input score 55
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 89.4%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.76; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 95.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.9% of revenue deployed · 55.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.