Forgotten Mom Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813927817
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Wellington, FL, USA
Phone
6466406099
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Parent Agencies

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$228
Assets
$462

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • FARID DALLAL (MANAGER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Per the taxpayer's website: "forgotten mom, inc. (fmi) is a registered (501)(c)(3), non-profit intiative established to address, support, and find help for the dramatically underserved population of individuals struggling with the disease of addiction. By focusing primarily on the mothers in need of treatment and support, fmi can best serve the widest scope of families caught in the seemingly overwhelming addiction and behavioral health struggle. Through years of work in the field of addiction treatment and wellness outreach, the fmi leadership recognized that mothers are more acutely engaged and involved with their communities than any other part of the population, and are therefore, the key to connecting with families in need of help. As a result, fmi has built a platform that focuses initially on the matriarch and build a safety net for all those in need of support.

What it reported doing in 2021

Increased awareness of programs and mission statement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -92.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -108.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $228 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.