Forever Frogmen C/o David Ferruolo

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862930984
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Laconia, NH, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,320
Expenses
$55,814
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID FERRUOLO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID FERRUOLO (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Veteran non profit- the principal purpose of this organization is to address mental health, substance use, re-integration, and suicide in the special operations veteran community locally and nation-wide. 1: we facllitate the training of veteran mentors who are also military veterans. We connect veteran volunteers with agencies like the va, nasw, nami, pesi, and facilitate their training as a professional veteran peer support mentor. We also have developed our own in-house training with two board members who hold relevant phos. In-need veterans are then connected with either a local, regional, or national mentor. The job of the mentor is to provide support, guidance, and connection to resources. 2: the forever frogmen acts as a connection vehicle, with an ever expanding national database of businesses, agencies, and people that specialize in helping veterans. 3: the forever frogmen sponsors multiple local, regional, and national community and connectivity gatherings, focused on bringing

What it reported doing in 2022

Mental health, substance use, re-integration, and suicide in the special operations veteran community locally and nation-wide

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.