Forekidz

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881749113
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
North Oaks, MN, USA
Phone
6128127539
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,482
Expenses
$17,064
Assets
$80,040
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC ROACH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ERIC ROACH (PRESIDENT)
  • JOSH LAMPI (TREASURER)
  • KATIE URBANIAK (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Forekidz is a summer golf program that gives kids access and the opportunity to learn and play golf expense free. The kids receive individual and group instruction from a pga professional instructor. They have unlimited access to the course's driving range. They are provided with golf clubs and other equipment necessary to participate.

What it reported doing in 2025

Forekidz is a summer golf program that gives kids access and the opportunity to learn and play golf expense free. Forekidz' summer camp program is in its initial stages of development. Forekidz incurred very few expenses to run the program as both the golf course and the time of the golf pro instructor were donated to the organization. All expenses incurred in calendar year 2025 have been allocated as programmatic expenditures.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23.5%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 72.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.69; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 44.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 52.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 62.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.5% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.