For the City Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832302589
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Okatie, SC, USA
Phone
8433686936
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,520
Expenses
$28,227
Assets
$77,459

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark DeVaney (President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark DeVaney (President)
  • William DeVaney (VicePresident)
  • Keri DeVaney (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We serve the people of Costa Rica through programs targeting, health, hunger, education and training. We are able to do this through the generosity of many people. Our three main services for 2024 are the Pink House which provides housing for people who are receiving cancer treatment in San Jose, Costa Rica. We have served over 25 patients in 2024. We also feed the homeless in San Jose every Sunday or Monday evening. Throughout 2024 we served over 10,000 plates of food. Our third ministry is our Dental Clinic where we provide basic dental care for 50 children. This primarily involves teeth cleaning and teeth extraction.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our third ministry is our Dental Clinic where we provide basic dental care for 50 children. This primarily involves teeth cleaning and teeth extraction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.7%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.74; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -34.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.