For Pete's Sake Cancer Respite Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
233013896
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA
Phone
2677080510
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,769,366
Expenses
$2,287,986
Assets
$13,857,547
Liabilities
$303,881

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARCELLA B SCHANKWEILER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARCELLA B SCHANKWEILER (CEO): $154,024 total reported compensation
  • CHERYL POMPEO (CHIEF PHILAN): $129,778 total reported compensation
  • EDWIN HARRY PARRY (CFO (APRIL-D): $58,957 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fps enables cancer patients and their loved ones the opportunity to strengthen, deepen and unify their relationships by creating unforgettable and lasting respite experiences. In fy25, fps responded to 496 inquiries from across the country and provided respite services to 135 patients and their families, resulting in 119 travel respite experiences with 388 travelers and 19 staycation respites experiences with 59 family members. Additionally, 59 people were served through direct ancillary services. Thus, fps served a total of 447 people through its direct respite travel and staycation programs this year. In addition, fps continued its support of prior respite recipients through its ancillary support program with over 36,077 touchpoints made to almost 3,000 families. Due to covid-19, two main changes to our respite program include our focused approach to community respites with our travel partner woodloch resort and the formalization of our staycation respite program. When the pandemic o

What it reported doing in 2024

Fps also provides emotional support to our fps families. In fy25, fps provided 36,077 diect ancillary support contacts and responded to 496 program inquiries. Furthermore, social media and the internet has allowed fps to reach over 12,750 people through indirect ancillary support. These touchpoints include phone calls, text messages, fps family events, facebook, patient self-care newsletter, and cancer care books and grief related resources as formalized in our respite reinforced program. Fps has been collecting outcome measures of its community respite model to gauge program effectiveness and the therapeutic benefits of respite. This data is critical in assessing the organizations continued advocacy of its mission and has become the basis for its strategic approach to changing the continuum of care for cancer patients and their families. Please review this data on the for pete's sake website under about us strategic initiatives https://takeabreakfromcancer.org/strategic-initiatives/ this data is continually updated. We believe that a cancer diagnosis affects the cancer patient, the caregiver and the family members in complex ways. Our hope for our patients and caregivers is that while on respite, they laugh a little louder, hug a little more and recognize that love defines their life story, not cancer. Our program is structured to effectuate meaningful change following a model for family health. This model includes family, mental, physical, psychosocial, emotional, spiritual and financial health. We strive to create a meaningful experience for each recipient and ask our patients and nominators to complete pre and post respite outcome measures. In addition to this community respite data, fps continues to use a measurement that has been in place since 2005. Such measurement indicates an overall rating in the improved ability to cope with cancer. One hundred percent of all nominating professionals recognize post-respite improvement in the patients and patient's family/caregiver's ability to cope with cancer. Specifically, they note a 49% increase in the patient's coping ability, a 44% increase in the caregiver's coping ability, and a 52% increase in the children's coping ability. As part of the fps commitment to transparency, fps posts its patient and nominator outcome measures on its website under the impact section. Respite makes a difference. Our respite data and outcomes have been recognized by the american society of clinical oncology (asco) and published in an april 2020 fps abstract, titled "individual and community respite as supportive care for adult cancer patients, their caregivers and their families". Fps has presented twice at the american psychosocial oncology society (apos) national conference on the therapeutic impact of respite on patients, caregivers and their families relative to strengthened communication, relationships, resilience, quality of life and coping with cancer. The presentation is titled "cancer families' intentional respite experience, family dynamics and positive outlooks". Fps also began a research study to correlate the significance of respite with improved outcomes related to overall family health including communication, treatment, mental health, relationships (both within family and treatment team) and other generalized daily activities. This study was completed during the fiscal year and the data is currently being scored and will be available upon completion. Capital campaign: fps is in the third year of a 25 million respite transformed campaign that will add 5 million to the current endowment and raise 20 million to construct the nation's first respite center for families facing cancer. Expecting to last three to five years, this campaign aligns with fps' 2030 strategic vision and strong outcome measures from woodloch respites. Every space lends for transformative experiences that will change the continuum of care for cancer patients. Dedicated spaces, including an art studio, pool, play

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.8%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 66.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.06; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.8% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $154K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.