Foothills United Way Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
846042598
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017
Location
Lafayette, CO, USA
Phone
3034444013
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,988,132
Expenses
$2,314,001
Assets
$1,809,132
Liabilities
$601,614

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOUG YEISER (CEO/PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DOUG YEISER (CEO/PRESIDENT): $120,982 total reported compensation
  • PHIL BRAUDAWAY-BAUMAN (VP-FINANCE): $73,184 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Collaboratively identify community priority needs and desired outcomes, unite community resources in pursuit of agreed upon goals, and take action

What it reported doing in 2017

Volunteer connectionfoothills united way's volunteer connection, one of the first volunteer referral centers in the nation, strengthens the communities of boulder and broomfield counties through volunteer advocacy and engagement. Through maintenance of an online database, special publications, one-on-one advising, customized team projects, and an annual day of caring, volunteer connection supports over 250 area nonprofits in their volunteer recruitment. In addition to building a culture of volunteering, last year alone volunteer connection provided over $125,000 in volunteer time to the community. Imagination librarythrough enrollment in dolly parton's imagination library, children ages 0-5 receive a book mailed to their home each month. Through 2018 over 2,400 children have graduated from the program and over 108,180 books have been distributed through fhuw's imagination library, increasing the likelihood of school readiness.familywizefamilywize prescription discount program: in the last two years, 40% of people in the united states have either skipped filling a prescription or reduced their doses because the medicine was too expensive. To address this, foothills united way, boulder county, and the city of boulder have partnered to bring the familywize prescription discount program to our local community. Cards are distributed through local nonprofit agencies, city of boulder services, and foothills united way. In 2018 this program helped approximately 2,000 families save over $230,000 on prescription drug costs. Digital access for alldigital access for all works to ensure that everybody living in the boulder valley school district is online and digitally literate by 2023. Their focus is on skill building and access to both digital devices and the internet across three target populations: families on limited income with school-aged children, adults for whom english is not their first language, and elderly adults. The collaboration includes nonprofits, school districts, community partners, family resource centers, and local libraries.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 36.8%; rating input score 37; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 37/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.