Foothills Humane Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581413121
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Columbus, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8288634444
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $952,029
- Expenses
- $868,872
- Assets
- $1,109,584
- Liabilities
- $51,772
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Carol Parker (President)
- Kit Haas (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Carol Parker (President)
- Kit Haas (Vice President)
- Debra Gentry (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The society's mission is to shelter, prevent cruelty and adopt animals and to educate the public about responsible animal ownership.
What it reported doing in 2024
Foothills Humane Society, a private 401c 3 non-profit no-kill animal welfare organization has been a cornerstone of our community since 1957. What sets us apart is our commitment to accepting all stray dogs and cats picked up by Animal Control Officers in Polk County and surrounding areas despite being a private organization. In a rural community where unneutered animals roam freely, our shelter experiences a constant influx of animals requiring medical care, vaccinations, spaying/neutering, and basic training to find loving homes. Annually our intake is around 1200 1600 dogs and cats including those seized due to neglect and abuse. Ninety-four percent of those intakes are adopted into homes. Additionally, Foothills Human Society offers the important community service of returning lost animals to their owners. These owners are often residents but can include tourists and equestrians who visit our area with their pets and are misplaced through no fault of their own. We also address the responsibilities and benefits of spaying or neutering pets through education and awareness and by providing low-cost options. Through a generous donation, we now have on-site equipment for our own spay/neuter clinic. We intend to have the support of local veterinarians to provide this surgery pro bono to the shelter. This is an exciting prospect for the many dogs and cats who have adopters but cannot leave the facility until they are neutered. Foothills Human Society is run by a volunteer Board of Directors, a paid Executive Director, and her small staff who takes its mission seriously. All other positions are filled by volunteers requiring up to 4500 volunteer hours per month. With only 17.6 of the annual expenditures covered by Polk County, Foothills Humane Society depends upon grants, donations, and in-kind contributions to fund its mission. The Foothills Humane Society remains committed to serving the dogs and cats of Tryon, Columbus, Mill Spring, Saluda, and parts of Rutherfordton, NC that are withinPolk County - and as space allows, Landrum, Campobello, and Gowensville, SC, for this and many years to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 73.3%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.3% of revenue deployed · 73.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $637K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.