Food4kidz Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453070614
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Panama City Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8502495439
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,367
- Expenses
- $206,296
- Assets
- $29,314
- Liabilities
- $320,259
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BOBBIE A BRIGMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- BOBBIE A BRIGMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DAVID KNIGHT (DIRECTOR)
- PAT POULSON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A non-profit organization dedicated to identifying at-risk-for-hunger children. Operates a full service food bank to families with children. Food4kidz provides relief to struggling and hurting children in the local community. The organization seeks to serve those children and their families who are in need by providing food, supplies and/or support that are often not readily available through other resources.
What it reported doing in 2022
Collect and distribute food to needy children and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -101.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 10.93; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $185K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.