Food Yoga International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364887167
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Wilmington, DE, USA
Phone
2024079090
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Victims' Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,871
Expenses
$69,035
Assets
$1,389,579
Liabilities
$104,756

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Paul Rodney Turner (President)

People named in this filing

  • Juliana Castaned Rodriguez (Director)
  • Rupal Mehta (Director)
  • Luz Stella Castaneda (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

FFLGs mission is to bring about peace and in the world through the liberal of pure meals with loving intention. Food for Life Global pursues its by providing and operating support to Food for Lifes vegan hunger relief.

What it reported doing in 2025

FFLGs mission is to bring about peace and in the world through the liberal of pure meals with loving intention. Food for Life Global pursues its by providing and operating support to Food for Lifes vegan hunger relief . Food for Life Global assists efforts by: and expanding the of sanctified meals all over the world to the , and victims of disaster; and for the of Food for Life projects ; Food for Life to , the media, and the general public through public lectures, articles, the Internet, and mail; the Vedic culture of and equality throughout the world; Raising funds on behalf of Food for Life worldwide; Helping pure food prepared and served with loving intention as a viable mean.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 65
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.6%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.3%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.13; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.6% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.