Food From Farms
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811809207
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Anacortes, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3607553594
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,737
- Expenses
- $105,818
- Assets
- $22,922
- Liabilities
- $224
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeronimo Squires (President)
People named in this filing
- Jeronimo Squires (President)
- Kay Reinhardt (Treasurer)
- Kate Delavan (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Food From Farms increases access to food from local farms and farmers markets for kids, seniors, and those in need.
What it reported doing in 2019
Administering and Accounting for Skagit Valley Farmers Market Coalition food-insecurity programs, where vouchers are given to those in need which they can use to purchase fruits and vegetables from farms stands at participating, local farmers markets. In 2019, these programs include matching 100% of all EBT/SNAP dollars, providing vouchers to local food bank customers to be redeemed at Coalition markets, and providing children with Medicaid nutrition information and vouchers. Food From Farms also assured market managers are adequately trained and supported to run the programs and compensated clerks at each market for the same purpose. The Coalition included Anacortes, Bow, Concrete, Mount Vernon, and Sedro Woolley farmers markets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -112.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -48.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -50.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.