Fontana Skyhawks Youth Athletics
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863108247
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fontana, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9099891751
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,316
- Expenses
- $111,425
- Assets
- $69,703
- Liabilities
- $1,276
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDWARD LYON (PRESIDENT)
- NICHOLAS MATHENY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PEGGY LYON (DIRECTOR)
- EDWARD LYON (PRESIDENT)
- NICHOLAS MATHENY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide mentorship to youth with opportunities to grow and develop their skills, talents and character through academics, athletics, and community service. The organization will strive to instill its core values of sportsmanship, teamwork, integrity, loyalty and a strong work ethic through participation in youth football and cheer related activities that develop student athletes empowered with self-esteem, courage, perseverance and a healthy active lifestyle.
What it reported doing in 2024
The youth football and cheer programs provide opportunities for local boys and girls participate in organized football and cheerleading, through participation tournaments, practice and league games. This program serves as a platform for young athletes to learn the fundamentals of football and cheer, build friendships, and instill values that go beyond the field.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.2%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $110K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.