Folsom Officials Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820583644
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Folsom, CA, USA
Phone
9169830605
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Expenses
$3,383
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$20,643

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LARRY BOONE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LARRY BOONE (PRESIDENT)
  • AUDRY BOONE (SECRETARY)
  • T LESLIE CORBIN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific and primary objective of folsom officials association is to provide registered and trained sports officials to support the youth and adult sports programs of local park and recreation districts.the officials of foa officiate youth and adult sports including basketball, softball and volleyball programs for local park and recreation districts. In addition, the foa supports the greater sacramento softball association in providing softball officials as required. The foa has a training program for new officials in addition to the national and regional schools of sports officiating associations including the amateur softball association in order to provide and improve the quality of officiating for the youth and adult sports programs officiated by the foa.

What it reported doing in 2025

Officiated youth male and female sports events

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 33
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.