Follow My Steps Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852648252
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Springfield, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6172977491
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $499,685
- Expenses
- $414,183
- Assets
- $267,926
- Liabilities
- $64,250
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KASHAWN J SANDERS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- TYRONE WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KASHAWN J SANDERS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $16,962 total reported compensation
- TYRONE WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT): $13,369 total reported compensation
- ANTHONY PAYNE (CHIEF STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $10,692 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Opposing social-economic conditions faced by youth, in under resourced communities, by providing mentorship, career skills, and financial resources.
What it reported doing in 2025
Thrive over survive program - we impacted over 300 youth. Mentored youth are 55% more likely to enroll in college and 78% more likely to volunteer in their communities. Our mentors provided over 700 hours of one-on-one guidance. Mentored youth are 46% less likely to use illegal drugs and 27% less likely to begin drinking, contributing to healthier lifestyle choices. We awarded over $15,000 in scholarships, helping youth overcome financial barriers to higher education. Data shows that scholarships increase college enrollment by up to 30%, ensuring long-term academic and career success.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 40
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.9%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 37.5%; rating input score 38; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 92.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 54.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 63% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.9% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $282K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $17K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.